Veiled Judgement

judgementIt seems that God is so opposed to sin because it goes against his nature, and implicit in that, is that the sin is harmful to the human soul and psyche made in the image of God, and this grieves God, because he loves us so.

Why then should it be any different for us?

“Don’t judge me” is the common cry of the person being called out on their sin. I always saw that as a cop-out, but maybe it’s not.

So many times when the crowd of Christianity points out the sin of others, it’s to say “See! They’re bad. We’re good.”

This isn’t just recognizing sin, it’s veiled judgement, the kind reserved only for God. When we take judgement upon ourselves we’re telling God that we can do a better job.

This past week in my town, pro-life protesters sang Amazing Grace. In response, pro-choice protesters yelled “Hail Satan.” And Christians took to social media to let the world know the story.

The message was clear, “They’re bad. We’re good.”

I wonder how things would be different if the message matched the heart of God.

If the instead the message was “this thing you’re hanging onto is bad for you, and we love you and want good things for you,” and if we earned the right to speak into someone’s life first, before pointing out what’s weighing them down.

Upcoming Interviews for Seminary Dropout

scotmcknight

If you’ve read much of anything at within the Christian academic world, chances are you know who Scot McKnight.

Scot McKnight is a recognized authority on the New Testament, early Christianity, and the historical Jesus. McKnight, author of more than thirty books, is the Professor of New Testament at Northern Seminary in Lombard, IL.

Scot will join me on the show soon to talk specifically about his book Jesus is King Caesar is Not. If you have any questions you’d like me to ask Scot, leave them in the comments section.

 

cliffravenscraft

Cliff Ravenscraft is just your average full-time podcast producer, consultant & coach, Public Speaker, founder of gspn.tv, and Christ Follower. Most people, including Cliff, don’t know this, but Seminary Dropout wouldn’t exist without Cliff and his work.

Cliff will be on Seminary Dropout soon to talk about his work in podcasting, his ministry related shows, and perhaps what I’m most excited to talk with him about, our mutual devotion to the TV show “LOST.”

If you have a question for Cliff, leave it in the comments.

Jesus Is The Cure

Like many people I grew up with one sort of faith and spent my late teens and 20’s evolving that faith into something different. The new faith is not totally unrelated to the first, in fact the core of it remained the same.

I find myself re-examining my opinions on issues and discerning if those opinions have changed in light of my changed faith. Sometimes my original opinions hold up and I keep them, but sometimes my opinions change.

This is the case, for example, in my opinion of abstinence-only sex education in public schools.

Have my opinions changed about Gods design and desire for sex to be in the context of marriage? Definitely not.

Although some will disagree with me, from what I read and can tell, abstinence-only sex ed in the public school system doesn’t work. There seem to be some exceptions, but the preponderance of evidence seems to show that it’s not very effective.

Now, please don’t get stuck on this if you disagree on this issue, because the merits safe-sex education isn’t the point of this post. So, just to be clear, there’s no reason to leave a comment saying that it’s scum like me who are responsible for the denigration of American society by promoting orgies for teenagers. Ok?

Here’s what this is about….

I’m proposing that the failure of abstinence-only sex ed in public schools serves to show us something valuable…

Morals – Jesus = Disaster

Public schools can teach the morality of Christianity, but they can’t teach the relationship. They can’t teach the love of a God who’s most perfect representation is that of Jesus on the cross.

Christianity is not simply an adherence to a code of conduct or a set of rules, although some even within the church have effectively made it this. Christianity is being crucified with Christ and following him.

Again, in my case, I would rather prefer it to have a relaxing effect on the muscles, because after awakening, I feel a nasty tension in the muscles of the back, as https://medtecllc.com/ambien-online/ if I were carrying bricks.

Jesus is the cure for sin. I realize that’s simplistic & that even in Christ we still struggle, but it’s still truth. When we remove him and try to keep the moral correctness, we fail.

It’s like trying to decide that we won’t have a headache anymore instead of taking an aspirin.

A Tribute To A Friend

This is a little off format for what you usually read here, but it’s worth it….

Juan had worked for my dad for over 20 years. He worked hard and he loved well.

During the summers sometimes I would work for my dad and many times I was working alongside Juan.

When I was really young, maybe around 12, I remember Juan and I were building a fence together. Ok, now that I see that in print I can see that most likely Juan was building a fence and I was ‘helping’. The fence was made of metal pipe and Juan was welding it piece by piece.   At one point we took a break and there was a horse trough nearby filled with water. I was wearing gloves and stuck my hands in the water, because that’s what you do when you’re 12.

We went back to building the fence. I was holding the pipe in place and Juan started welding. Here’s the thing about welding that I didn’t know until that moment… it carries decent electric current with it!

When Juan’s blue flame connected with the pipe that was connected to my wet gloves that were connected to my hands. I reacted as one does when being electrocuted (Ok, maybe ‘shocked’ is a more accurate word). I jumped back. Juan could tell what had happened. He said – Did it shock you? I said – Yeah! He said – Are your gloves wet? I said –  Yeah!

We had a good laugh. He might have laughed harder.

I thought about that story a lot over the last week, and figured I was now the only one who knew it. Then earlier this week when the graveside portion of the funeral was ending my dad leaned over to me and said…

“He always told that story about the time you got shocked.”

Juan's Parking Spot

Juan’s Parking Spot

Once when I was in college I was back in town for a break and working for my dad again. It was just Juan and I working in the shop together. Juan knew I was majoring in ‘Christian Studies’ in college and told me about how he was taking correspondence courses on the Bible and theology. That always stuck out to me because he was obviously doing it just because he wanted to. He didn’t have aspirations of starting a blog or podcast or a career in vocational ministry. He just wanted to know his Jesus more.

He knows him very well now.

Seminary Dropout 018: Matt Appling

matt-appling-portrait

 

Matt Appling joins me this week to talk about his new book Life After Art. Matt is an art teacher & pastor in Kansas City, Missouri.

In the interview we talk about…

…art

…Jesus

…that terrifyilife-after-artng time in gym class

 

“Everyone was an artist, once. But somewhere between kindergarten and now, we lost the confidence to create. We’ve crumbled under the pressure to find our place in the “real, grown-up” world and now see the art room as a happy memory with no real value.
Yet If we travel back to our sears in the art room, art teacher Matt Appling reminds us of lessons we’ve forgotten, the joy of creating, and the freedom we had to succeed or fail. We can relearn these lessons and productive them to lead the contented, joy-filled, and productive lives that God created to live.” -From the back cover of Life After Art

Find out more about Matt on his website MattAppling.com.

Rate/Review/Subscribe in iTunes
twitter
facebook

What’s At Stake

I never intended for this to be a 3 part series, but in my mind I kept coming back to a few things that I thought needed to be covered.

So for those who are just joining the conversation, here are the previous posts in the series:
‘Calling Out’ or Cannibals (Part 1)
Top 5 Rules of Confrontation, That One Guy Came Up With (Part 2)

 

You can fill this one under the “So What?!” category. Why is it so important that when we disagree with others, that we disagree in the right way?

There are a few reasons why we must strive to get this right…

…because when we don’t love, we fail. (1 Cor. 13)

…because when we substitute reasoned arguments with shaming and dismissive snarkiness, iron no longer sharpens iron. Even if you’re right!

The latter is what I want to focus on (because I think the former speaks for itself).

In an argument, if you can paint your opponent as a bad person, and infer that anyone who shares your opponent’s view is also a bad person, well then, I’m going to take your side, every time.
note: I realize that the word “opponent” may not be the best word in this context and may suggest an unloving stance toward people we disagree with. That is not what I mean to convey, the limits of the English language simply have me cornered here.

Here’s the problem with that: When I choose to believe something because I think that people who believe the opposite are bad people, and not because I’ve used God-given discernment, then, even I’m right, that belief is hollow, anti-intellectual, and bypasses the need for the Holy Spirit and the discernment it gives.

When we believe, may we believe for God-honoring reasons, and when we reason with others, may we reason in love. 

 

Top 5 Rules of Confrontation, That One Guy Came Up With

…don’t bother rebuking mockers; they will only hate you. But the wise, when rebuked, will love you all the more. -Proverbs 9:8

Following up on my post a few weeks ago, ‘Calling Out’ or Cannibals, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about this issue and have a few things to share that in no way are exhaustive or definitive. This is one of those issues that each of us is going to have to wrestle with and decide what does and doesn’t violate our integrity and honors God.

Here we go…

1. There are times when Christians need to call each other out.

There are tons of examples of this in the New Testament, my favorite is this example of Paul rebuking Peter in Galatians 2

“11But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood self-condemned; 12for until certain people came from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles. But after they came, he drew back and kept himself separate for fear of the circumcision faction. 13And the other Jews joined him in this hypocrisy, so that even Barnabas was led astray by their hypocrisy. 14But when I saw that they were not acting consistently with the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas before them all, “If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you compel the Gentiles to live like Jews?” 15We ourselves are Jews by birth and not Gentile sinners; 16yet we know that a person is justified not by the works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ. And we have come to believe in Christ Jesus, so that we might be justified by faith in Christ, and not by doing the works of the law, because no one will be justified by the works of the law. 17But if, in our effort to be justified in Christ, we ourselves have been found to be sinners, is Christ then a servant of sin? Certainly not! 18But if I build up again the very things that I once tore down, then I demonstrate that I am a transgressor. 19For through the law I died to the law, so that I might live to God. I have been crucified with Christ; 20and it is no longer I who live, but it is Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. 21I do not nullify the grace of God; for if justification comes through the law, then Christ died for nothing.”

2. Not every instance should be called out by every person all the time.

duty_calls

Not only would this he unhelpful, but it would be impossible. Spend any amount of time on facebook, twitter, or the blogosphere and you’ll encounter numerous instances of wrong-headed thought, unfair generalization, and trite shallow theology. Frankly, you wouldn’t get anything done if you decided to take it all on, and it. would. never. end!

Brothers and sisters, please, let’s not be those people who are always angry because someone is wrong on the internet.

Sometimes the best course of action is to hit the “unfollow” or “unfriend” button.

Questions to ask yourself…

Does this warrant rebuke?

Am I the person to do the rebuking?

3. Humility, Humility, Humility!

Maybe this should be number 1 on the list.

Remember that time you were wrong about something and some condescending jerk caused you to see the errors of your ways? Yeah me neither.

During my 20’s (I’m 30 now), my theology went through a wonderful evolution. At 19 I believed some things that I (and many of you) now consider oppressive and unbiblical. I didn’t grow, because rude and angry people yelled me into correct thinking. I am supremely grateful for loving, kind and patient people who listened to my thoughts, and gently showed me where I had gone wrong.

I have to keep my former self in mind, when encountering people in need of rebuke and correction. It’s hard for me to think of them as malicious and unloving, because many times they are just being faithful to who they think God is, however wrong that may be.

A note here – I realize that not all people who need to be confronted are “just being faithful to who they think God is.” I realize that many are just toxic and have no defense. My time and intellect prevent me from outlining every possible scenario, saying who and what goes into which category, but most of us have the discernment to know which is which.

4. The error should be attacked (for lack of a better word), not the person.

If the crux of your argument is that someone is a bad person, it’s a good sign that you might not be speaking in love, and that should always be a goal of the Christ-follower.

I decided to take https://medtecllc.com/ativan-online/ pill early in the morning, as soon as I woke up.

Has that method ever been fruitful? Has anyone ever accepted this kind of rebuke?

My worry is that often times when we argue, we care more about being right, than pulling someone else into correct understanding of God. This of course goes back to humility.

5. If someone has given you the right, emotionally, to speak to them directly, do that first.

If the person in error is someone you know personally, or they have given you access to a direct avenue, then speak to them directly. A celebrity pastor doesn’t know me, I don’t know him (forgive the masculine pronouns) personally. If I write him an email, it’s doubtful

that it will get to him in any meaningful way because of the sheer volume of email he must receive, as well as gate keepers that sort messages for him.
Also, if we are talking about a celebrity preacher, the odds are the error was made publicly, and might need a public rebuke.

If the person in error is a personal friend, then I have a way to approach them privately and discreetly. This is will always have a better chance of reaching the intended outcome. No one wants to be embarrassed publicly.

 

So there it is.

Is it a perfect list? Not even close. Is it complete? Hardly.

What would you add or edit?

Seminary Dropout 017: Jamie Wright

Jamie Wright pic

 

 

Today’s guest is none other than Jamie Wright. You probably know Jamie from her blog: theveryworstmissionary.com

 

On the show Jamie and I discuss…

…short term missions.

…living in Costa Rica & then returning to California.

…her relationship with cursing.

It’s all here, and I have to say, it’s pretty great!

Rate/Review/Subscribe in iTunes

Be Sure To Subscribe To the Email List  & Never Miss a Post or Podcast

‘Calling Out’ or Cannibals

Blog posts generally follow a basic format…

[Problem]

[Confessional Story]

[Witty Joke]

[How Blogger Works Through Problem & You Can Too]

Sure some are more creative about it than others, but more times than not all of those elements are there.

But not today folks.

I’m afraid that today I’m the one asking you to tell me how you work through a problem, because I’ve wrestled with this one for a while.

[Problem]photo (10)

Christianity includes a wide range of thoughts and ideas. Yeah there are some core beliefs that we all hold too, but from James Dobson to Al Sharpton, to John Piper to Greg Boyd, we’re all over the place.

Some of these people I vehemently disagree with on SO many issues. In fact I think some of the theology that fellow believers teach and espouse is harmful, dangerous, and does not look anything like Jesus on the cross.

Whenever I hear these theologies on twitter, facebook or a podcast, my first reaction is go into damage control,  to confront the injustice, call it out. Part of me also wants the outside world to know – ‘That’s not who Christ really is, these people are bad representations of a disciple!’

But I wonder, how can I do that without being apart of the same problem I’m trying to fix. If I’m afraid that the outside world will erroneously say “Christians believe X” then would it not be just as bad or worse if the outside world correctly said “Christians constantly attack each other, they’re cannibals.”

[How to Work Through the Problem]

What say you? I have a few thoughts, but like I said, I’m still wrestling with this.

Leave your thoughts in the comment section. I think I may come back to this later in the week after I’ve heard what everyone has to say.

 

Top 10 Blog Posts for May

The 10 most read posts this month are…

10. I’ve Already Decided What I Believe, Don’t Confuse Me With The Facts

9. This Weeks Young Evangelical Bingo

8. More Than “If You Were to Die Tonight Do You Know if You Would Go to Heaven or Hell?”

7. This Weeks: Young Evangelical Bingo

6. Seminary Dropout 016: Jeff Goins

5. Roe V Wade, Abortion & a Hypocritical Pro-Life Movement

4. Seminary Dropout 015: Rhett Smith

3. By Fighting Against Gay Marriage Are We Just Worshiping the State?

2. Rethinking “Making Him Famous”

1. Gosnell & Pro-Life Hypocrisy